Skip to main content

Virtual Project Supervisors



Exactly why is there such a goal project managers being on site all day, day-to-day? Am i not the only the one which has pointed out that? Whenever I talk with clients or colleagues about PM positions whether a lot of the time or on contract, the focus appears to always be on being on site all of the time. In today's world of worldwide projects and excellent technology, I would send that being on site could sometimes be a hindrance.
I understand, obviously, that on projects in which the team is there each day focusing on tasks and gifts, and so forth, someone needs to be there to answer questions, provide leadership and ensure things are moving as organized. I have been on many projects where this is the case and I have found that sometimes it is harmful to the team to offer the PM around all the time. Teams can use the PM as a crutch where, rather than exploring the answer to something or sharing the information with one another, everything needs to funnel through the PM HOURS. This brings about a dangerous level of dependence on the PM and does indeed not evoke a really having faith in environment. If I are unable to trust my team to work on their jobs and deliverables just because I am not there watching over their shoulder muscles, then maybe I have the wrong team.

When a PM's job is to provide leadership, manage associates, communicate to leadership, use suppliers and ensure goals and objectives are bring met, then how come being there every day mean all of this will be performed? Are Presidents and CEOs present day-to-day at their workplace? Definitely not, yet amazingly work seems to get done. My fear is that the world of task management has become one of controlling, not of providing skills and knowledge to successfully implement tactical initiatives. It has become a question of how often can you be here, not what value is the organization heading to get because of this with this project.

With today's technology, I am reachable exactly where I might be, whether on outdoor, at a conference or within my office. Through phone or email, I can almost always be reached (except on planes, but that is beyond my control) If perhaps there are issues on a project, I can be reached, even if I am not on site. My MO is to check in with my project teams on a regular basis through in person meetings, phone and email, but not to be on site all day everyday for living of a project. I actually have found this works effectively because it develops independence within the team, but also provides a safety net of communication when issues do occur. I encourage my clubs to call me when they need to and i also like to create open dialogue. If perhaps we see the results, then there is no relevance whether I was on site or not. You can call myself the Virtual Project Supervisor!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Leading Managers Using Latest Resource Management Software

There are numerous resources available to a company a manager has to effectively coordinate in order for the company to succeed. These resources may include manpower, funds and information technology. Prior to the creation of resource management software, managers a new hard time designating the various resources to the diverse projects that the companies were willing to undertake. During this period, the managers worked in an environment that was packed with paper. It was at times inconvenient when it came to looking through these papers to gain access to the kind of information. It was irritating and time wasting for managers. This concern and the complexity of the resource management contributed to the introduction of affordable resource management software that has greatly aided in boosting the way that the managers synchronize and allocate these resources. This has gone a long way in boosting the efficiency and accuracy and reliability of the managers as well as ensuring max...
1 comment
Read more

Always be a Good Manager

Making use of The 'Productive Lazy' Way Avoid the Swamp This kind of is linked in so many ways to the communication topic already protected. If you create a communication plan that ensures to swamp you from 1, what is the benefit; to you or the project? None! The master plan should ensure you are not viewed as the oracle on all matters, or that you feel the bottleneck for a positive information flow within the project team. Most tasks develop communication plans that are the documented method for getting the right information to the right people at the right time. We all know that each stakeholder has different requirements for facts and so the plan specifies what, how and how often communication should be made. What project operators rarely do is consider and map all communication flows, official, unofficial, developing or complete, is to do a load research across the project composition of these communication moves. If they did they would spot bottlenecks much earl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Top skills for successful project leaders

I would say in working over numerous enterprises and with various Executives, authority is the main key to venture achievement. I've seen unremarkable undertakings prevail with fantastic authority while beyond any doubt to-succeed ventures flop because of an absence of initiative. Along these lines, finding and keeping the best venture pioneers is basic. What are the top attributes of fruitful venture pioneers? Extend pioneers do the accompanying: Set Direction. Similarly as with all pioneers, it is essential for venture pioneers to set heading. It is the pioneer's duty to build up the technique and convey it obviously and over and again to the venture group and all through the association. There is a colossal distinction in a venture group with an unmistakable heading where everybody knows how they fit in and how they contribute esteem, than in the ones where the venture pioneer may know it, yet every other person sees just their little bit of the bewilder - not the est...
Post a Comment
Read more