Skip to main content

Virtual Project Supervisors



Exactly why is there such a goal project managers being on site all day, day-to-day? Am i not the only the one which has pointed out that? Whenever I talk with clients or colleagues about PM positions whether a lot of the time or on contract, the focus appears to always be on being on site all of the time. In today's world of worldwide projects and excellent technology, I would send that being on site could sometimes be a hindrance.
I understand, obviously, that on projects in which the team is there each day focusing on tasks and gifts, and so forth, someone needs to be there to answer questions, provide leadership and ensure things are moving as organized. I have been on many projects where this is the case and I have found that sometimes it is harmful to the team to offer the PM around all the time. Teams can use the PM as a crutch where, rather than exploring the answer to something or sharing the information with one another, everything needs to funnel through the PM HOURS. This brings about a dangerous level of dependence on the PM and does indeed not evoke a really having faith in environment. If I are unable to trust my team to work on their jobs and deliverables just because I am not there watching over their shoulder muscles, then maybe I have the wrong team.

When a PM's job is to provide leadership, manage associates, communicate to leadership, use suppliers and ensure goals and objectives are bring met, then how come being there every day mean all of this will be performed? Are Presidents and CEOs present day-to-day at their workplace? Definitely not, yet amazingly work seems to get done. My fear is that the world of task management has become one of controlling, not of providing skills and knowledge to successfully implement tactical initiatives. It has become a question of how often can you be here, not what value is the organization heading to get because of this with this project.

With today's technology, I am reachable exactly where I might be, whether on outdoor, at a conference or within my office. Through phone or email, I can almost always be reached (except on planes, but that is beyond my control) If perhaps there are issues on a project, I can be reached, even if I am not on site. My MO is to check in with my project teams on a regular basis through in person meetings, phone and email, but not to be on site all day everyday for living of a project. I actually have found this works effectively because it develops independence within the team, but also provides a safety net of communication when issues do occur. I encourage my clubs to call me when they need to and i also like to create open dialogue. If perhaps we see the results, then there is no relevance whether I was on site or not. You can call myself the Virtual Project Supervisor!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Leading Managers Using Latest Resource Management Software

There are numerous resources available to a company a manager has to effectively coordinate in order for the company to succeed. These resources may include manpower, funds and information technology. Prior to the creation of resource management software, managers a new hard time designating the various resources to the diverse projects that the companies were willing to undertake. During this period, the managers worked in an environment that was packed with paper. It was at times inconvenient when it came to looking through these papers to gain access to the kind of information. It was irritating and time wasting for managers. This concern and the complexity of the resource management contributed to the introduction of affordable resource management software that has greatly aided in boosting the way that the managers synchronize and allocate these resources. This has gone a long way in boosting the efficiency and accuracy and reliability of the managers as well as ensuring max...
1 comment
Read more

The Easiest Project Management Process

One of the difficulties of disclosing Project management to individuals who are new to the approach, is that portrayals are regularly either so abnormal state as to be inane, or so nitty gritty that they are overpowering. Throughout the years, I have come to utilize a model as a system for presenting and examining project management tools and procedures . It can be utilized as the reason for a five-minute clarification of what is associated with project management, yet in addition as a blueprint for more point by point talks. (The genuine model can be found on the Key Counseling site under free layouts and data.) A concise explanation of each step follows: -   Team Collaboration The task arranging group will be collected, including fitting depiction from clients/customers, and some of the time subcontractors and sellers. Beginning parts and duties will be characterized. Deliverables: Primary project setup documentation, Construct Team ambition: With the task ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Risk management is a great tool to spot potential problems

The type of problems Now I am talking about is often seen in projects where new technology is released or where the availability of a brand new service will depend on the introduction of new-technology. It's the sort of problem where an obstacle presents itself and progress on the complete project is affected. Various times the barrier poises a core feature the sponsor is eager to see. So what can we as project professionals do to deal with these very 'hard to resolve' problems that inevitably arise? There are several ways to deal with problems that arise over the course of task management. Every problem has its own attributes and requires it is own approach to dealing with. But there are some generic actions you can take. These center throughout the notion that projects demand a team-based approach to problem solving and a job manager can facilitate team performance. The above all account is that the team solving the challenge needs to be a 'team'. This ...
Post a Comment
Read more