Skip to main content

Contract management


Perhaps you have ever been asked to review an agreement at the start of a project only to determine some of the details are missing? Have you at any time enter into the middle of a project only find out that the service levels in the agreement are not being fulfilled? Think about contracts where service levels are not even being tracked? It makes you ask problem
Generally there are too many situations where organizations spend lots of money on legal fees and resource amount of time in the negotiation of an agreement, only to never look at it again. The whole purpose of discussing service levels in a contract shall be able to hold the supplier given the task of a minimum level of performance. If no person is heading to track against those service levels, then how does one know they are being met? If an organization negotiates prices for services or products, what is a reasonable time-frame before those rates need to be reviewed for validity?

Deal management should be an essential part of any project and any business. You do not desire a fancy system or repository, simply a simple method of tracking the details of your contracts and being proactive in their revival. I have had clients that are still buying IT equipment from the same agreements that were negotiated 5-10 years in the past. Not only have companies significantly increased the service levels that they supply since then, but the price a vast amount of the equipment has eliminated down significantly. This company is not only giving money on the desk, nonetheless they are spending valuable useful resource time supporting equipment that other suppliers would be supporting for these people, at a lower cost than their current contract.

It is imperative that organizations and projects fully understand which contracts are active, which contracts are springing up for renewal and when, and what is the value of each of the organization's contracts. There is other pertinent information that should be tracked as well, but by knowing which contracts are expiring, when they expire and the value, organizations can take a proactive procedure to managing those agreements. Priorities can be established as to where useful resource time should be put in in re-establishing those agreement and time can be invested in doing enough research in order that the re-negotiated deals provide more quality to the organization.

Managing contracts is not rocket science, neither is a specific skill set required. It only requires the capability to manage existing information within an arranged fashion and anticipate changes in the marketplace that will be good for your company and your project.

Seems like a quite easy way to provide additional value to your organization, doesn't it?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Project failure and how to take control

In recent times, it's become apparent that a major contributor to success or failure on software projects has to do with team communication, both internally and outwardly. From a systems view, creating great application is about taking expert thinking and domain knowledge, and then effectively moving it about the team in short reviews loops. This rapid-fire venture and conversation is what blends the minds of a team in both an additive and combinatorial process to create top quality killer apps. Killer software are essentially software models of the thinking mind, in order for normally stupid device to mimic the logic of intelligence creatures. Three key ingredients often determine project failure or success: domain knowledge, deadlines, and dialog. You can think of them as "The Three Ds. inch Domain knowledge is evident. It takes smart people with the right knowledge to create the right stuff. Deadlines are also critical - there must be satisfactory time to make things
Post a Comment
Read more

Capable Resource Management

Previous those days when the world was driven by the barter system, it was really hard to determine the value of an item or an enterprise. Man invented money which became the regular factor in deciding the worth of any useful resource or an object. This is said that, all it requires is a bright idea to take on the market, but the key part is to survive in this at any time growing competitive world. For just about any enterprise to have a healthy grip of this market, it can be necessary that they have a capable resource management in place. An organization can have the best employees earning money for them, but if they are not doing the right work with the right time, they are not doing much to returning the business. So, managing both individuals and non-human resources is a crucial starting for any organisation. Most of the time, such resources are existing across different location. TouchBase - Resource management tool allows organisations to obtain their own common refere
Post a Comment
Read more

How to deal with project executives.

Right now, when I say deal with, of course I do not mean a great away Battle Royal cage go with your Project Executive (PE). After all, when you come to a point in the project and you and the PE differ, fundamentally (on a specific merchant, let's say). Let's presume, for the purpose of this article, you have already sat down and reviewed the issue on sensible conditions and you still both sit on contrary sides of the concern... what do you do? As the Project Supervisor (PM), you are in charge of ensuring the achievements of the project. As the PE, your colleague will be accountable for the success of the job. You both have a lot at stake, so some discussions can get quite heated. There are a few things you can do to solve this: Try to determine the PE's motivation for their decision. Are they determined purely by the success of the project, and there other areas that may be influencing them? Their boss? Office national politics? Desire to be acknowledged? After get
Post a Comment
Read more